4.8 Article

HiFENS: high-throughput FISH detection of endogenous pre-mRNA splicing isoforms

Journal

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
Volume 50, Issue 22, Pages -

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkac869

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Cancer Institute
  2. Center for Cancer Research [1ZIAB010309-23]
  3. National Institutes of Health (NIH)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Researchers have developed a high-throughput imaging assay, HiFENS, based on the hybridization chain reaction, to screen for cellular factors that regulate alternative splicing of endogenous genes. They identified potential candidate upstream splicing regulators of the FGFR2 gene through an RNAi screen.
Splicing factors play an essential role in regulation of alternative pre-mRNA splicing. While much progress has been made in delineating the mechanisms of the splicing machinery, the identity of signal transduction pathways and upstream factors that regulate splicing factor activity is largely unknown. A major challenge in the discovery of upstream regulatory factors of pre-mRNA splicing is the scarcity of functional genomics screening methods to monitor splicing outcomes of endogenous genes. Here, we have developed HiFENS (high throughput FISH detection of endogenous splicing isoforms), a high-throughput imaging assay based on hybridization chain reaction (HCR) and used HiFENS to screen for cellular factors that regulate alternative splicing of endogenous genes. We demonstrate optimized detection with high specificity of endogenous splicing isoforms and multiplexing of probes for accurate detection of splicing outcomes with single cell resolution. As proof-of-principle, we perform an RNAi screen of 702 human kinases and identify potential candidate upstream splicing regulators of the FGFR2 gene. HiFENS should be a useful tool for the unbiased delineation of cellular pathways involved in alternative splicing regulation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available