4.8 Article

Structures of annexin A2-PS DNA complexes show dominance of hydrophobic interactions in phosphorothioate binding

Journal

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
Volume 51, Issue 3, Pages 1409-1423

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkac774

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigates the structural and biochemical interactions between phosphorothioate-modified antisense oligonucleotides and annexin A2 protein. The researchers found that a unique mode of hydrophobic interactions accounts for the enhanced affinity of modified nucleic acids for the protein. This mechanism of interaction is not only observed for nucleic acid-binding proteins but also accounts for the association of phosphorothioate-modified oligonucleotides with other proteins.
The introduction of phosphorothioate (PS) linkages to the backbone of therapeutic nucleic acids substantially increases their stability and potency. It also affects their interactions with cellular proteins, but the molecular mechanisms that underlie this effect are poorly understood. Here, we report structural and biochemical studies of interactions between annexin A2, a protein that does not possess any known canonical DNA binding domains, and phosphorothioate-modified antisense oligonucleotides. We show that a unique mode of hydrophobic interactions between a sulfur atom of the phosphorothioate group and lysine and arginine residues account for the enhanced affinity of modified nucleic acid for the protein. Our results demonstrate that this mechanism of interaction is observed not only for nucleic acid-binding proteins but can also account for the association of PS oligonucleotides with other proteins. Using the anomalous diffraction of sulfur, we showed that preference for phosphorothioate stereoisomers is determined by the hydrophobic environment around the PS linkage that comes not only from protein but also from additional structural features within the ASO such as 5-Me groups on cytosine nucleobases.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available