4.3 Article

Palaeogeographic evolution of Zealandia: mid-Cretaceous to present

Journal

NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF GEOLOGY AND GEOPHYSICS
Volume 66, Issue 3, Pages 528-557

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/00288306.2022.2115520

Keywords

Palaeogeography; tectonics; Cretaceous; Paleogene; Neogene; palaeobathymetry; palinspastic reconstruction; rifting; subduction

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article presents a set of palaeogeographic maps illustrating the geological evolution of Zealandia, along with geological datasets and regional tectonics analysis. The maps are created using GPlates and GIS, allowing for easy modification and reconstruction of geological datasets. Additionally, the reconstructions are done within a palaeomagnetic reference frame, enabling assessment of palaeo-latitude for paleoclimate and paleobiogeographic studies.
We present a suite of 15 palaeogeographic maps illustrating the geological evolution of the entirety of Zealandia, from mid-Cretaceous to present, highlighting major tectonic phases, from initial Gondwana rifting through to development of the Neogene plate boundary. They illustrate palaeobathymetric and palaeofacies interpretations along with supporting geological datasets and a synthesis of regional tectonics. The maps are underpinned by a geologically-constrained and structurally-based rigid retro-deformation block model. This model, tied to the global plate circuit, is relatively simple for the main regions of Northern and Southern Zealandia, but breaks central Zealandia into numerous fault-bounded blocks, reflecting complex Neogene deformation associated with the modern plate boundary. Production of maps using GPlates and GIS allows for simple alteration or refinement of the block model and reconstruction of any geological dataset at any time. Reconstructions are within a palaeomagnetic reference frame, allowing assessment of palaeo-latitude, critical for palaeo-climatic and palaeo-biogeographic studies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available