4.6 Article

From common gardens to candidate genes: exploring local adaptation to climate in red spruce

Journal

NEW PHYTOLOGIST
Volume 237, Issue 5, Pages 1590-1605

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/nph.18465

Keywords

adaptive genes; climate transfer distance; conifer; genome scan; genotype-environment association; Picea rubens

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study combines genomic methods and common gardens to investigate local adaptation in red spruce. It identifies environmental gradients and loci involved in climate adaptation and uncovers phenotypic evidence of local adaptation to climate.
Local adaptation to climate is common in plant species and has been studied in a range of contexts, from improving crop yields to predicting population maladaptation to future conditions. The genomic era has brought new tools to study this process, which was historically explored through common garden experiments. In this study, we combine genomic methods and common gardens to investigate local adaptation in red spruce and identify environmental gradients and loci involved in climate adaptation. We first use climate transfer functions to estimate the impact of climate change on seedling performance in three common gardens. We then explore the use of multivariate gene-environment association methods to identify genes underlying climate adaptation, with particular attention to the implications of conducting genome scans with and without correction for neutral population structure. This integrative approach uncovered phenotypic evidence of local adaptation to climate and identified a set of putatively adaptive genes, some of which are involved in three main adaptive pathways found in other temperate and boreal coniferous species: drought tolerance, cold hardiness, and phenology. These putatively adaptive genes segregated into two 'modules' associated with different environmental gradients. This study nicely exemplifies the multivariate dimension of adaptation to climate in trees.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available