4.7 Article

The central extended amygdala guides survival-relevant tradeoffs: Implications for understanding common psychiatric disorders

Journal

NEUROSCIENCE AND BIOBEHAVIORAL REVIEWS
Volume 142, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2022.104879

Keywords

Fear; Anxiety; Defensive behavior; Reward; Consummatory; Action selection; Extended amygdala; Bed nucleus of the stria terminalis; Central nucleus of the amygdala; BST; BNST; Ce; CeA

Funding

  1. NIH [R01MH121735, R21MH129851, R01MH131264]
  2. California National Primate Research Center [P51OD011107]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To thrive in challenging environments, individuals must seek rewards while avoiding threats. The central extended amygdala (EAc), which includes the central nucleus of the amygdala (Ce) and bed nucleus of the stria terminalis (BST), plays a crucial role in defensive behavior. However, recent studies have revealed that the EAc is also involved in survival- and emotion-relevant response selection.
To thrive in challenging environments, individuals must pursue rewards while avoiding threats. Extensive studies in animals and humans have identified the central extended amygdala (EAc)-which includes the central nucleus of the amygdala (Ce) and bed nucleus of the stria terminalis (BST)-as a conserved substrate for defensive behavior. These studies suggest the EAc influences defensive responding and assembles fearful and anxious states. This has led to the proliferation of a view that the EAc is fundamentally a defensive substrate. Yet mechanistic work in animals has implicated the EAc in numerous appetitive and consummatory processes, yielding fresh insights into the microcircuitry of survival- and emotion-relevant response selection. Coupled with the EAc's centrality in a conserved network of brain regions that encode multisensory environmental and interoceptive information, these findings suggest a broader role for the EAc as an arbiter of survival- and emotion-relevant tradeoffs for action selection. Determining how the EAc optimizes these tradeoffs promises to improve our understanding of common psychiatric illnesses such as anxiety, depression, alcohol- and substanceuse disorders, and anhedonia.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available