4.8 Review

Drugging p53 in cancer: one protein, many targets

Journal

NATURE REVIEWS DRUG DISCOVERY
Volume 22, Issue 2, Pages 127-144

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41573-022-00571-8

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Mutations in the TP53 gene are common in cancer, but restoring p53 functionality has been considered impossible for a long time. However, recent years have seen promising developments in p53-based therapy, including improved strategies and novel approaches. Small molecules that protect or restore p53 function are gaining interest, along with tailored drugs for specific p53 mutants. Additionally, gene therapy and immunotherapy are being reconsidered. However, significant challenges remain.
Mutations in the TP53 tumour suppressor gene are very frequent in cancer, and attempts to restore the functionality of p53 in tumours as a therapeutic strategy began decades ago. However, very few of these drug development programmes have reached late-stage clinical trials, and no p53-based therapeutics have been approved in the USA or Europe so far. This is probably because, as a nuclear transcription factor, p53 does not possess typical drug target features and has therefore long been considered undruggable. Nevertheless, several promising approaches towards p53-based therapy have emerged in recent years, including improved versions of earlier strategies and novel approaches to make undruggable targets druggable. Small molecules that can either protect p53 from its negative regulators or restore the functionality of mutant p53 proteins are gaining interest, and drugs tailored to specific types of p53 mutants are emerging. In parallel, there is renewed interest in gene therapy strategies and p53-based immunotherapy approaches. However, major concerns still remain to be addressed. This Review re-evaluates the efforts made towards targeting p53-dysfunctional cancers, and discusses the challenges encountered during clinical development.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available