4.7 Review

How to build a cognitive map

Journal

NATURE NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 25, Issue 10, Pages 1257-1272

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41593-022-01153-y

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Sir Henry Wellcome Post-doctoral Fellowship [222817/Z/21/Z]
  2. Wellcome Principal Research Fellowship [219525/Z/19/Z]
  3. Wellcome Collaborator award [214314/Z/18/Z]
  4. JS McDonnell Foundation [JSMF220020372]
  5. Wellcome Trust [203139/Z/16/Z, 203147/Z/16/Z]
  6. Wellcome Trust DPhil Scholarship
  7. Wellcome Trust [222817/Z/21/Z, 219525/Z/19/Z, 214314/Z/18/Z] Funding Source: Wellcome Trust

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article categorizes different cognitive map models into an ontology, revealing their connections and suggesting new approaches to understanding hippocampal-cortical interactions.
Learning and interpreting the structure of the environment is an innate feature of biological systems, and is integral to guiding flexible behaviors for evolutionary viability. The concept of a cognitive map has emerged as one of the leading metaphors for these capacities, and unraveling the learning and neural representation of such a map has become a central focus of neuroscience. In recent years, many models have been developed to explain cellular responses in the hippocampus and other brain areas. Because it can be difficult to see how these models differ, how they relate and what each model can contribute, this Review aims to organize these models into a clear ontology. This ontology reveals parallels between existing empirical results, and implies new approaches to understand hippocampal-cortical interactions and beyond. This Review organizes models of cognitive maps into a clear ontology. This ontology reveals parallels between existing empirical results and implies new approaches to understand hippocampal-cortical interactions and beyond.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available