4.8 Article

The evolutionary dynamics of extrachromosomal DNA in human cancers

Journal

NATURE GENETICS
Volume 54, Issue 10, Pages 1527-+

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41588-022-01177-x

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Cancer Research UK [CGCSDF-2021\100007, C11496/A17786, C416/A21999]
  2. National Cancer Institute [CGCSDF-2021\100007]
  3. National Brain Tumour Society [R01-CA238349]
  4. National Institutes of Health (NIH) [R01-CA238349]
  5. NIH [R35-CA209919, U24CA264379, 1R01GM114362]
  6. Barts Charity Lectureship [MGU045]
  7. UKRI Future Leaders Fellowship
  8. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke [NS047101]
  9. A.P. Giannini Foundation
  10. German Research Foundation [398299703]
  11. European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme [949172]
  12. Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas [RR210034]
  13. Francis Crick Institute, from Cancer Research UK [FC001169]
  14. UK Medical Research Council [FC001169]
  15. Wellcome Trust [FC001169]
  16. Cancer Research UK Lung Cancer Centre of Excellence [C11496/A30025]
  17. Rosetrees Trust
  18. Butterfield and Stoneygate Trusts
  19. NovoNordisk Foundation [16584]
  20. Royal Society Professorship Enhancement Award [RP/EA/180007]
  21. National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre at University College London Hospitals
  22. Cancer Research UK-University College London Centre
  23. Cancer Research UK-Experimental Cancer Medicine Centre
  24. Breast Cancer Research Foundation [BCRF 20-157]
  25. Stand Up To Cancer (SU2C)-LUNGevity-American Lung Association Lung Cancer Interception Dream Team Translational Research Grant [SU2C-AACR-DT23-17]
  26. ERC Advanced Grant (PROTEUS) from the European Research Council under the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme [835297]
  27. Vienna Science and Technology Fund [LS18-111]
  28. Austrian Science Fund [I4162, P35841-B]
  29. St. Anna Kinderkrebsforschung
  30. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [I4162, P35841] Funding Source: Austrian Science Fund (FWF)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Random segregation of extrachromosomal DNA contributes to intratumoral heterogeneity and facilitates the rapid adaptation of human tumor cells to anticancer drugs. Oncogene amplification on extrachromosomal DNA (ecDNA) is a common event, driving aggressive tumor growth, drug resistance and shorter survival. Through theoretical models, unbiased image analysis, CRISPR-based ecDNA tagging with live-cell imaging and CRISPR-C, it is shown that random ecDNA inheritance results in extensive intratumoral ecDNA copy number heterogeneity and rapid adaptation to metabolic stress and targeted treatment.
Random segregation of extrachromosomal DNA contributes to intratumoral heterogeneity and facilitates the rapid adaptation of human tumor cells to anticancer drugs. Oncogene amplification on extrachromosomal DNA (ecDNA) is a common event, driving aggressive tumor growth, drug resistance and shorter survival. Currently, the impact of nonchromosomal oncogene inheritance-random identity by descent-is poorly understood. Also unclear is the impact of ecDNA on somatic variation and selection. Here integrating theoretical models of random segregation, unbiased image analysis, CRISPR-based ecDNA tagging with live-cell imaging and CRISPR-C, we demonstrate that random ecDNA inheritance results in extensive intratumoral ecDNA copy number heterogeneity and rapid adaptation to metabolic stress and targeted treatment. Observed ecDNAs benefit host cell survival or growth and can change within a single cell cycle. ecDNA inheritance can predict, a priori, some of the aggressive features of ecDNA-containing cancers. These properties are facilitated by the ability of ecDNA to rapidly adapt genomes in a way that is not possible through chromosomal oncogene amplification. These results show how the nonchromosomal random inheritance pattern of ecDNA contributes to poor outcomes for patients with cancer.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available