4.8 Article

Functional antibodies exhibit light chain coherence

Journal

NATURE
Volume 611, Issue 7935, Pages 352-+

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41586-022-05371-z

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. 10x Genomics

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Research shows that for naive antibodies, the probability of using the same light chain V gene is around 10%, while for memory (functional) antibodies, even if only one cell per clonotype is used, this probability can reach up to 80%. This property of functional antibodies is referred to as light chain coherence.
The vertebrate adaptive immune system modifies the genome of individual B cells to encode antibodies that bind particular antigens(1). In most mammals, antibodies are composed of heavy and light chains that are generated sequentially by recombination of V, D (for heavy chains), J and C gene segments. Each chain contains three complementarity-determining regions (CDR1-CDR3), which contribute to antigen specificity. Certain heavy and light chains are preferred for particular antigens(2-22). Here we consider pairs of B cells that share the same heavy chain V gene and CDRH3 amino acid sequence and were isolated from different donors, also known as public clonotypes(23,24). We show that for naive antibodies (those not yet adapted to antigens), the probability that they use the same light chain V gene is around 10%, whereas for memory (functional) antibodies, it is around 80%, even if only one cell per clonotype is used. This property of functional antibodies is a phenomenon that we call light chain coherence. We also observe this phenomenon when similar heavy chains recur within a donor. Thus, although naive antibodies seem to recur by chance, the recurrence of functional antibodies reveals surprising constraint and determinism in the processes of V(D)J recombination and immune selection. For most functional antibodies, the heavy chain determines the light chain.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available