4.8 Article

Integrated ozone depletion as a metric for ozone recovery

Journal

NATURE
Volume 608, Issue 7924, Pages 719-+

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41586-022-04968-8

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NERC through NCAS [R8/H12/83/003]
  2. NERC [NE/R001782/1, NE/V011863/1]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The Montreal Protocol has effectively protected the ozone layer by regulating halogen gases responsible for ozone depletion. While ozone levels have increased in some parts of the atmosphere, further metrics are needed to monitor the success of the Protocol. This study proposes the use of an integrated ozone depletion metric to assess the impact of new emissions.
The Montreal Protocol is successfully protecting the ozone layer. The main halogen gases responsible for stratospheric ozone depletion have been regulated under the Protocol, their combined atmospheric abundances are declining and ozone is increasing in some parts of the atmosphere(1). Ozone depletion potentials(2-4), relative measures of compounds' abilities to deplete stratospheric ozone, have been a key regulatory component of the Protocol in successfully guiding the phasing out in the manufacture of the most highly depleting substances. However, this latest, recovery phase in monitoring the success ofthe Protocol calls for further metrics. The 'delay in ozone return' has been widely used to indicate the effect of different emissions or phase-down strategies, but we argue here that it can sometimes be ambiguous or even of no use. Instead, we propose the use of an integrated ozone depletion (IOD) metric to indicate the impact of any new emission. The IOD measures the time-integrated column ozone depletion and depends only on the emission strength and the whole atmosphere and stratospheric lifetimes of the species considered. It provides a useful complementary metric of the impact of specific emissions of an ozone depleting substance for both the scientific and policy communities.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available