4.0 Article

A Tight Approximation Towards the SEP Computation Over Nakagami-m Fading Channels

Journal

NATIONAL ACADEMY SCIENCE LETTERS-INDIA
Volume 45, Issue 5, Pages 423-426

Publisher

SPRINGER INDIA
DOI: 10.1007/s40009-022-01162-2

Keywords

Composite approximation; Symbol error probability; Modulation; Nakagami-m fading; Gaussian Q-function

Funding

  1. Department of Science and Technology (DST)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper focuses on the computation of the Gaussian Q-function in emerging wireless communication environments. It proposes composite and tighter exponential bounds for more accurate evaluation of the average symbol error probability (SEP) over fading channels, which is simpler than existing approximations. Additionally, it provides analytical solutions for the SEP integrals over Nakagami-m fading channels for both general non-rectangular quadrature amplitude modulation (QAM) and rectangular QAM (R-QAM).
In emerging pragmatic wireless communication environments, the evaluation of several performance measures requires computation of the Gaussian Q-function. Specifically, the analytical solution of symbol error probability (SEP) integrals over fading channels requires precise approximation of various functions, viz., erf(.), erfc(.) and Q(.). In this setting, the paper portrays composite and tighter exponential bounds towards the Gaussian Q-function for effective evaluation of average SEP over fading channels. The composite framework operates well for lower and higher input values of signal-to-noise ratio and is mathematically simpler in contrast to the existing approximations of the Gaussian Q-function. Furthermore, in context with Nakagami-m fading channels for different values of fading parameter, the analytical solution corresponding to SEP integrals for general non-rectangular quadrature amplitude modulation (QAM) and rectangular QAM (R-QAM) are provided.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available