4.8 Review

Metal-organic frameworks based surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy technique for ultra-sensitive biomedical trace detection

Journal

NANO RESEARCH
Volume 16, Issue 2, Pages 2968-2979

Publisher

TSINGHUA UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1007/s12274-022-4914-1

Keywords

metal-organic framework (MOF); surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS); synthesis strategy; biomedical trace detection

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This review article summarizes the combined application of metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) and surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) technology to improve sensing performance and broaden the applications of SERS substrates. The article introduces representative synthesis strategies of MOFs to fabricate SERS-active substrates, and reviews their applications in ultra-sensitive biomedical trace detection. In addition, it discusses the relative barriers, advantages, disadvantages, future trends, and prospects to provide guidance to relevant researchers.
Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) have attracted widespread interest due to their unique and unprecedented advantages in microstructures and properties. Besides, surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) technology has also rapidly developed into a powerful fingerprint spectroscopic technique that can provide rapid, non-invasive, non-destructive, and ultra-sensitive detection, even down to single molecular level. Consequently, a considerable amount of researchers combined MOFs with the SERS technique to further improve the sensing performance and broaden the applications of SERS substrates. Herein, representative synthesis strategies of MOFs to fabricate SERS-active substrates are summarized and their applications in ultra-sensitive biomedical trace detection are also reviewed. Besides, relative barriers, advantages, disadvantages, future trends, and prospects are particularly discussed to give guidance to relevant researchers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available