4.6 Article

Volatile Composition and Sensory Profile of Lactose-Free Kefir, and Its Acceptability by Elderly Consumers

Journal

MOLECULES
Volume 27, Issue 17, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/molecules27175386

Keywords

lactose-free kefir; volatile compounds; sensory attributes; just-about-right scale; consumer preferences; elderly subjects

Funding

  1. Ministry of Science and Higher Education of Poland

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Lactose-free kefir (LFK) is preferred by lactose-intolerant elderly consumers due to its unique volatile compound profile and sensory attributes, such as creamy aroma, intense sweetness, and lower acidity compared to traditional kefir (TK).
Lactose-free products are crucial in the diet of lactose-intolerant elderly consumers, one of them being kefir due to its unique chemical composition and diversity of valuable microflora. The study aimed at determining the volatile compound profile and the corresponding sensory attributes of lactose-free kefir (LFK) as compared with the traditional one (TK). The perception of main sensory attributes and hedonic acceptability of LFK by elderly were also studied. The LFK contained two times more ketones, especially 3-hydroxy-2-butanone and 2,3-butanedione, that probably contributed to the high intensity of creamy aroma. A substantial share of acetic acid in LFK was not associated with high intensity of sour aroma, probably being masked by the creamy aroma, perceived as dominating. LFK was sensed as sweeter and more milky than the traditional one. The intense sweet taste of LFK was due to higher amounts of glucose and galactose than in TK, and was perceived as just about right by 63% of elderly subjects in the just-about-right (JAR) scale. The lower acidity of LFK than that of TK, assayed both instrumentally and by sensory assessment, was highly appreciated by 73% of elderly subjects as just about right in JAR scale. These two taste attributes dominated in liking the lactose-free kefir by elderly subjects.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available