4.6 Article

Graph Neural Network for Protein-Protein Interaction Prediction: A Comparative Study

Journal

MOLECULES
Volume 27, Issue 18, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/molecules27186135

Keywords

graph neural networks; protein-protein interaction; neural networks

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [62102349]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper presents a comparative study of various graph neural networks for protein-protein interaction prediction. The experimental results show that hyperbolic graph neural networks tend to have a better performance than the other methods on the protein-related datasets.
Proteins are the fundamental biological macromolecules which underline practically all biological activities. Protein-protein interactions (PPIs), as they are known, are how proteins interact with other proteins in their environment to perform biological functions. Understanding PPIs reveals how cells behave and operate, such as the antigen recognition and signal transduction in the immune system. In the past decades, many computational methods have been developed to predict PPIs automatically, requiring less time and resources than experimental techniques. In this paper, we present a comparative study of various graph neural networks for protein-protein interaction prediction. Five network models are analyzed and compared, including neural networks (NN), graph convolutional neural networks (GCN), graph attention networks (GAT), hyperbolic neural networks (HNN), and hyperbolic graph convolutions (HGCN). By utilizing the protein sequence information, all of these models can predict the interaction between proteins. Fourteen PPI datasets are extracted and utilized to compare the prediction performance of all these methods. The experimental results show that hyperbolic graph neural networks tend to have a better performance than the other methods on the protein-related datasets.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available