4.7 Article

Evaluation of two new highly multiplexed PCR assays as an alternative to next-generation sequencing for IDH1/2 mutation detection

Journal

MOLECULAR ONCOLOGY
Volume 16, Issue 22, Pages 3916-3926

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/1878-0261.13311

Keywords

cancer; ddPCR; IDH1; 2; leukemia; NGS; qPCR

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study compared two new multiplexed PCR assays for IDH1/2 mutation detection and found that the ddPCR assay had better analytical performances than the PGX assay, with high specificity, sensitivity, and correlation with NGS results. Therefore, the new highly multiplexed ddPCR is a fast and cost-effective assay that can be used to identify and follow cancer patients during anti-IDH1/2-targeted therapies.
IDH1 and IDH2 somatic mutations have been identified in solid tumors and blood malignancies. The development of inhibitors of mutant IDH1 and IDH2 in the past few years has prompted the development of a fast and sensitive assay to detect IDH1(R132), IDH2(R140) and IDH2(R172) mutations to identify patients eligible for these targeted therapies. This study aimed to compare two new multiplexed PCR assays - an automated quantitative PCR (qPCR) on the PGX platform and a droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) with next-generation sequencing (NGS) for IDH1/2 mutation detection. These assays were evaluated on 102 DNA extracted from patient peripheral blood, bone marrow and formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue samples with mutation allelic frequency ranging from 0.6% to 45.6%. The ddPCR assay had better analytical performances than the PGX assay with 100% specificity, 100% sensitivity and a detection limit down to 0.5% on IDH1(R132), IDH2(R140) and IDH2(R172) codons, and a high correlation with NGS results. Therefore, the new highly multiplexed ddPCR is a fast and cost-effective assay that meets most clinical needs to identify and follow cancer patients in the era of anti-IDH1/2-targeted therapies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available