4.6 Article

TREM2 and Microglia Contribute to the Synaptic Plasticity: from Physiology to Pathology

Journal

MOLECULAR NEUROBIOLOGY
Volume 60, Issue 2, Pages 512-523

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12035-022-03100-1

Keywords

Synaptic plasticity; TREM2; Microglia; Neurodegenerative diseases; Alzheimer's disease

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This review summarizes the main characteristics of synapses and synaptic plasticity under physiological and pathological conditions. It elaborates on the role of microglia and the signaling pathways involved in regulating synaptic plasticity. The review also highlights the unique role of TREM2 in microglia-mediated regulation of synaptic plasticity and its relationship with AD, as well as proposing four possible ways in which TREM2 is involved in regulating synaptic plasticity.
Synapses are bridges for information transmission in the central nervous system (CNS), and synaptic plasticity is fundamental for the normal function of synapses, contributing substantially to learning and memory. Numerous studies have proven that microglia can participate in the occurrence and progression of neurodegenerative diseases (NDDs), such as Alzheimer's disease (AD), by regulating synaptic plasticity. In this review, we summarize the main characteristics of synapses and synaptic plasticity under physiological and pathological conditions. We elaborate the origin and development of microglia and the two well-known microglial signaling pathways that regulate synaptic plasticity. We also highlight the unique role of triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells 2 (TREM2) in microglia-mediated regulation of synaptic plasticity and its relationship with AD. Finally, we propose four possible ways in which TREM2 is involved in regulating synaptic plasticity. This review will help researchers understand how NDDs develop from the perspective of synaptic plasticity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available