4.4 Article

Object kinetic Monte Carlo modelling of irradiation microstructures with elastic interactions

Publisher

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1088/1361-651X/ac9d57

Keywords

object kinetic Monte Carlo; elastic interactions; fast multipole method; dislocations

Funding

  1. Euratom research and training program [633053, 101052200-EUROfusion]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study presents a method to accurately and efficiently evaluate the strain field in object kinetic Monte Carlo simulations, allowing for a quantitative prediction of material properties. The method significantly speeds up simulations over experimental time scales compared to direct summation methods. The study investigates the growth rates of loops in a thin foil under irradiation, revealing their dependence on loop radius and highlighting the complex effects caused by the surrounding microstructure.
Elastic interactions between point defects and sinks, such as dislocations and cavities, affect the diffusion of point defects and are responsible for some of the features observed in microstructures under irradiation. It is therefore necessary to include elastic interactions in kinetic simulations for a quantitative prediction of material properties. In this work a method is presented to accurately and efficiently evaluate the strain field in object kinetic Monte Carlo simulations. It can handle any strain field which is biharmonic, such as the one generated by a dislocation segment or a cavity in isotropic elasticity. A speed-up of several orders of magnitude is obtained compared to the direct summation over strain sources, so that simulations over experimental time scales can be performed within reasonable computation times. The case of a thin foil containing a high density of loops under irradiation is investigated. Loop growth rates are found to depend on the loop radius, as shown experimentally, but more complex effects due to the surrounding microstructure are also highlighted.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available