4.3 Article

Design and demonstration of a 2.5D frequency-selective surface for sub-6 GHz 5G wireless communication

Journal

MICROWAVE AND OPTICAL TECHNOLOGY LETTERS
Volume 65, Issue 1, Pages 135-142

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/mop.33486

Keywords

2; 5D FSS; angular stability; polarization insensitive; sub-6 GHz 5G spectrum

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper presents an ultraminiaturized bandstop closed-loop 2.5D frequency-selective surface (FSS) for sub-6 GHz 5G wireless communication. The proposed structure forms a modified closed-loop design by interconnecting metallic elements with four metallic vertical vias. It achieves a resonant notch at 3.62 GHz and effectively blocks the entire sub-6 GHz 5G band. The prototype shows good agreement between simulated and measured results and exhibits polarization insensitivity.
This paper presents an ultraminiaturized bandstop closed-loop 2.5D frequency-selective surface (FSS) for sub-6 GHz 5G wireless communication. Four metallic vertical vias interconnect metallic elements present on both sides of the substrate to form a modified closed-loop design. The proposed structure band stops the entire sub-6 GHz 5G band (C-band/NR N78 band/LTE 42/43 band) ranging from 3.2 to 3.9 GHz with a resonant notch at 3.62 GHz. This design supports polarization insensitivity and procures maximum relative deviation of 0.5% and 0.2% at 80 degrees incident transverse electric (TE) and transverse magnetic (TM) polarized waves, respectively. The proposed FSS prototype has been fabricated and tested. Experimentally, the resonant notch is obtained at 3.55 and 3.68 GHz under TE and TM normal incident polarized waves, respectively. Moreover, good agreement in the frequency response curves is observed between simulated and measured results. The proposed unit cell is 3.6 x 3.6 mm(2) in dimensions, which is 0.04 lambda x 0.04 lambda, where lambda is the resonant wavelength.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available