4.6 Article

Enhancement of the Mechanical Properties of a V-Ti-N Microalloyed Steel Treated by a Novel Precipitation-Quenching & Partitioning Process

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11661-022-06778-z

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Sichuan Science and Technology Program [2021YJ0555]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [52003181]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, a novel precipitation-quenching & partitioning (P-Q&P) process was proposed to increase the strength of a V-Ti-N microalloyed steel without sacrificing plasticity. However, the P-Q&P samples had lower impact toughness, which may be attributed to the coarser substructures formed during the process.
In this study, a novel precipitation-quenching & partitioning (P-Q&P) process was proposed by combining a proper intermediate holding treatment with the Q&P process, which successfully increased the strength of a V-Ti-N microalloyed steel without sacrificing the plasticity. However, the impact toughness of the P-Q&P samples is lower than that of the Q&P sample. Compared to the Q&P sample, the P-Q&P samples have more retained austenite. In addition, coarser substructures of martensite and bainite were formed in the P-Q&P samples. All the P-Q&P and Q&P samples contain two types of carbonitrides, which are the large-size particles (enriched in Ti) formed or undissolved in austenite and the small-size particles (enriched in V) formed in martensite and bainite. The P-Q&P samples have a smaller size and larger volume fraction of the large-size particles than the Q&P sample. The increase in the strength of the P-Q&P samples is attributed to the precipitation strengthening of the carbonitrides formed in austenite during the intermediate holding treatment. And the maintained elongation is mainly caused by the higher austenite content in the P-Q&P samples. The poor toughness of the P-Q&P samples is mainly resulted from the coarser substructures.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available