4.7 Article

TED: Two-stage expert-guided interpretable diagnosis framework for microvascular invasion in hepatocellular carcinoma

Journal

MEDICAL IMAGE ANALYSIS
Volume 82, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.media.2022.102575

Keywords

Hepatocellular carcinom; Microvascular invasion; Biomarker; Triplet loss; Expert-Guided Representation Learning; Tumor Attribute Identification

Funding

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2019YFB1804304]
  2. 111 plan [BP0719010]
  3. STCSM [18DZ2270700, 21DZ1100100]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper proposes a Two-stage Expert-guided Diagnosis (TED) framework for MVI in HCC, which predicts key imaging attributes and leverages attention and soft supervision to improve the interpretability of the network.
Microvascular invasion (MVI) has been clinically recognized as a prognostic factor for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after surgical treatment. Detection of MVI before surgical operation greatly benefit patients' prognosis and survival. Most of the existing methods for automatic diagnosis of MVI directly use deep neural networks to make predictions, which do not take into account clinical knowledge and lack of interpretability. To simulate the radiologists' decision process, this paper proposes a Two-stage Expert-guided Diagnosis (TED) framework for MVI in HCC. Specifically, the first stage aims to predict key imaging attributes for MVI diagnosis, and the second stage leverages these predictions as a form of attention as well as soft supervision through a variant of triplet loss, to guide the fitting of the MVI diagnosis network. The attention and soft supervision are expected to jointly guide the network to learn more semantically correlated representations and thereafter increase the interpretability of the diagnosis network. Extensive experimental analysis on a private dataset of 466 cases has shown that the proposed method achieves 84.58% on AUC and 84.07% on recall, significantly exceeding the baseline methods.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available