4.4 Article

Biomechanical analysis of a customized lumbar interspinous spacer based on transfacetopedicular screw fixation: A finite element study

Journal

MEDICAL ENGINEERING & PHYSICS
Volume 107, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2022.103850

Keywords

Lumbar biomechanics; Interspinous spacer; Transfacetopedicular screw fixation; Finite element

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study introduces a lumbar customized posterior fixation system that provides better mobility restriction and lower stress at the surgical level, with a more pronounced reduction in stress on the intervertebral discs.
The interspinous spacer (ISP) is a minimally invasive surgical device implanted into the interspinal space to treat lumbar degenerative diseases. Unfortunately, ISPs sometimes cause device breakage and spinal process fracture. Our aim was to elaborate the design of lumbar customized posterior fixation system (CISP system), encompassing a customized ISP body and transfacetopedicular screws, and examine its biomechanical effect on the lumbar spine using finite element (FE) analysis. We constructed the CISP system, based on the interspinal anatomical data at the surgical level. We generated the L3-S1 FE models, implanted with the polyetheretherketone (PEEK) CISP system, titanium alloy (TI) CISP system, and Coflex device at the L4/L5 segment, and determined the lumbar segmental range of motions (ROMs), intervertebral discs (IVD) peak stress, and implant stresses. The CISP system enhanced mobility restriction at the surgical level, compared to the Coflex device. Furthermore, the IVD peak stress reduction was more obvious in the CISP system than the Coflex device, particularly during extension. Under the same motion mode, the maximum stress on the TI CISP system was smaller than on the Coflex device, but larger than the PEEK CISP system. Given these evidences, PEEK appeared to be a better material for the CISP body.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available