4.6 Article

Effects of annealing temperature on interface microstructure and element diffusion of ultra-thin Cu/Al composite sheets

Journal

MATERIALS LETTERS
Volume 322, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.matlet.2022.132491

Keywords

Metallic composite sheets; Diffusion; Microstructure; Annealing

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this research, ultra-thin Cu/Al metallic composite sheets were successfully prepared using a self-designed four-high laboratory micro mill. The effect of different annealing temperatures on the microstructure and element diffusion at the Cu/Al interface was investigated. The results showed that grain refinement promoted element interdiffusion, with the formation of micropores and microcracks at annealing temperatures of 350-450°C. Metallurgical bonding occurred at an annealing temperature of 350°C, and the highest degree of element diffusion was observed at 500°C.
In this research, the ultra-thin Cu/Al metallic composite sheets of 0.06 0.09 mm were successfully prepared by the self-designed four-high laboratory micro mill. The cold rolling reduction of single pass was up to 70%. The effect of different annealing temperatures on microstructure and element diffusion of the Cu/Al composite sheet interface was investigated at the microscale. The results show that with the increase of annealing temperature, the average grain size of Cu and Al increases gradually, the mutual diffusion of Cu/Al elements increases. Compared with the macroscale, the grain refinement of the ultra-thin Cu/Al composite sheets can promote the interdiffusion of Cu and Al elements. When the annealing temperature was 350 450 C, a relatively large number of micropores and microcracks appeared at the interface of Cu/Al composite sheet. When the annealing temperature was 350 C, a diffusion layer was formed at the interface of the ultra-thin Cu/Al composite sheet, and the interface bonding method was metallurgical bonded. When the annealing temperature was 500 C, the mutual diffusion degree of elements was the largest at the interface.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available