4.7 Article

A state-of-the-art guide to the sterilization of thermoplastic polymers and resin materials used in the additive manufacturing of medical devices

Journal

MATERIALS & DESIGN
Volume 223, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2022.111119

Keywords

Sterilization; Medical device; Mechanical test; Structural analysis; Polymer; Cytotoxicity; Additive Manufacturing; 3D Printing; Disinfection

Funding

  1. UP MS grant [EFOP-3.6.1-16-2016-00004, GINOP-2.3.2-15-2016-00022]
  2. Establishment of the Center of Excellence in Defense Health at the University of Pecs Medical School [KA-2019-40, KA-2020-09]
  3. University of Pecs [TKP2021-NVA-06]
  4. [2020-4.1.1-TKP2020]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study evaluates the effect of different sterilization and disinfection methods on the most commonly used additive manufacturing technologies and materials in medical device development. The results show significant structural or aesthetic alterations after the sterilization and disinfection treatments, but no significant cytotoxic effect is observed.
Continuous development of additive manufacturing technologies has reached new areas, including med-ical research and healthcare applications, where precision, highly accurate reproducibility, disinfection, or even sterility of the end product is essential. The study aims to critically evaluate the effect of different sterilization and disinfection methods for most commonly used additive manufacturing technologies and materials in medical device development: PLA (polylactic acid), PETG (polyethylene terephthalate glycol), ABS (acrylonitrile butadiene styrene), and HIPS (high impact polystyrene) for material extrusion technol-ogy (FFF; fused filament fabrication), polyamide (PA2200) for powder bed fusion technology (SLS; selec-tive laser sintering), MED610TM for PolyJetTM material jetting, and standard FormlabsTM white resin (V4) for SLA (stereolithography) technology. The materials were tested before and after different sterilization and disinfection protocols, including treatment with 70% ethanol, chlorine solution, H2O2 plasma sterilization, autoclave and dry heat sterilization, applying 10 and 20 cycles in all cases. Bacteriostatic/fungistatic and sterility tests were performed using Escherichia coli, Enterococcus faecalis, and Candida albicans as refer-ence strains. Cytotoxicity was evaluated using A549 cells. The samples showed significant structural or aesthetic alterations detected by various mechanical tests, scanning electron microscopy, or differential scanning calorimetry (DSC-TGA). No significant cytotoxic effect was revealed during the experiment. Our results can serve as a guide for the selection of effective sterilization and disinfection methods for the most common materials used in 3D printing in medical and healthcare applications.(c) 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available