4.7 Article

High GDF-15 Serum Levels Independently Correlate with Poorer Overall Survival of Patients with Tumor-Free Stage III and Unresectable Stage IV Melanoma

Journal

JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE DERMATOLOGY
Volume 136, Issue 12, Pages 2444-2452

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jid.2016.07.016

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Interdisciplinary Center for Clinical Research (IZKF), University of Wurzburg Medical School, Wurzburg, Germany
  2. Deutscher Akademischer Auslandsdienst (DAAD)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Biomarkers are strongly needed for diagnostic surveillance of patients with metastatic melanoma. On the basis of its known association with tumor metastasis and its ability to induce cancer cachexia, we investigated serum levels of growth and differentiation factor 15 (sGDF-15) as a marker for overall survival (OS). sGDF-15 was retrospectively measured by ELISA in 761 samples obtained at distinct time points during routine clinical care of patients with stage III/IV melanoma. In the entire cohort, sGDF-15 >= 1.5 ng/ml was strongly associated with reduced OS after assessment. Subsequent analyses were performed separately for tumor-free stage III, tumorfree stage IV, and unresectable stage IV patients. For patients with unresectable distant metastasis (n = 206), sGDF-15 was independently associated with OS when considered together with the M-category and superior to serum level of lactate dehydrogenase. Analysis in tumor-free stage III patients during routine surveillance (n = 468) revealed sGDF-15 to be associated with OS and an independent factor when considered together with S100B and the pattern of locoregional metastasis. Only in tumor-free stage IV patients (n = 87) sGDF-15 was not associated with OS. sGDF-15 should thus be further validated as a marker for early detection of recurrence in stage III patients and as a prognostic or predictive marker particularly in the context newly available treatments in unresectable stage IV patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available