4.7 Article

Anchored bulk carriers have substantial impacts on the underwater soundscape in Cowichan Bay, British Columbia

Journal

MARINE POLLUTION BULLETIN
Volume 182, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2022.113921

Keywords

Soundscape; Shipping noise; Acoustic additions

Funding

  1. Fisheries and Oceans Canada's Ocean and Freshwater Science Contribution Program, NSERC
  2. Liber Ero Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In recent decades, the increase in shipping traffic has led to higher underwater ambient noise levels. While research has been conducted on the noise generated by ships underway, little is known about potential noise from ships at anchor. This study focused on Cowichan Bay, British Columbia, and found that when a carrier was anchored, sound pressure levels in the bay increased, demonstrating the impact anchored carriers can have on underwater soundscapes and the potential consequences for marine organisms and ecosystems.
In recent decades shipping traffic has increased, leading to elevated underwater ambient noise levels. Research has been conducted on the noise generated by ships underway, however little is known about potential noise from ships at anchor. In coastal regions, commercial vessels can seek anchorages prior to entering port, leading to concern regarding the impacts on the soundscape and marine ecosystems. Cowichan Bay, British Columbia, a coastal region (800 Ha) 70 km away from the Port of Vancouver, was examined as a case study to understand the possible soundscape contribution from anchored bulk carriers. When a carrier anchored, sound pressure levels (SPL: 20-24,000 Hz) were elevated 2-8 dB re: 1 mu Pa throughout the bay. These results demonstrate the change anchored carriers can have on underwater soundscapes and is an important step in understanding the potential impact these vessels may have on marine organisms and important ecosystems.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available