4.7 Article

Does coastal armoring affect biodiversity and its functional composition on beaches?

Journal

MARINE ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH
Volume 181, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.marenvres.2022.105760

Keywords

Coastal squeeze; Benthic macrofauna; Sea-level rise; Functional traits; Seawall

Funding

  1. Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior-Brasil (CAPES) [001]
  2. Fundacao Boticario [1133-20182]
  3. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo (FAPESP) [2018/19776-2, 2015/03804-9, 2018/22036-0, 2017/17071-9]
  4. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (CNPq) [309697/2015-8, 310553/2019-9]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Coastal armoring has negative impacts on sandy beach fauna, reducing infaunal richness and abundance in the subtidal zones. However, overall functional richness is not affected by coastal armoring. Small suspension feeders are more associated with armored beaches, while large-bodied species and predators are more frequent at vegetated beaches.
Sandy beaches are increasingly squeezed due to the construction of backshore man-made structures (i.e., coastal armoring) and current global changes. Coastal armoring impacts beach sediment dynamics, inducing erosion and habitat loss, threatening biodiversity processes and the functional roles of sandy beach organisms. Here, we examine how the abundance, taxonomic richness, and functional richness of sandy beach fauna are affected by coastal armoring. We compared macrobenthic infaunal communities on five armored beaches (with backshore urban structures) and five vegetated beaches (not-armored). We also evaluated the abundance and biomass of upper-beach arthropods using pitfall traps, comparing armored and vegetated segments within the beaches. Infaunal richness and abundance were lower at armored beaches, mainly in the subtidal zones, because of a reduction in polychaete and molluscan abundance. There was no difference in overall functional richness be-tween the armored and vegetated beaches. Nevertheless, we found that functional groups such as small sus-pension feeders were more associated with armored beaches, while large-bodied species and predators were more frequent at vegetated beaches. Pitfall traps showed that coastal armoring also reduced the abundance of the upper-beach coleopteran Phaleria testacea, leading to a loss of biomass. Therefore, our data suggest that coastal armoring can influence the functional composition of sandy beach biodiversity and significantly impact mac-robenthic abundance and biomass.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available