4.4 Review

Six decades of malaria vector control in southern Africa: a review of the entomological evidence-base

Journal

MALARIA JOURNAL
Volume 21, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12936-022-04292-6

Keywords

Malaria vectors; Vector control; Malaria elimination; Southern African region

Funding

  1. AFRO-II Project under the auspices of the Global Environment Facility/United Nations Environment Programme (GEF/UNEP) through the World Health Organization Regional Office for Africa (WHO-AFRO)
  2. icipe's core donors, the Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office (FCDO) of the UK Government
  3. Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (Sida)
  4. Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation (SDC)
  5. Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia
  6. Kenyan Government

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper reviews entomological research on malaria vector control in six countries in southern Africa, highlighting the lack of information on malaria vectors and their control in frontline elimination countries. The study emphasizes the importance of strengthening research capacity and routine monitoring to enhance decision-making for malaria elimination.
Background Countries in the southern Africa region have set targets for malaria elimination between 2020 and 2030. Malaria vector control is among the key strategies being implemented to achieve this goal. This paper critically reviews published entomological research over the past six decades in three frontline malaria elimination countries namely, Botswana Eswatini and Namibia, and three second-line malaria elimination countries including Mozambique, Zambia, and Zimbabwe. The objective of the review is to assess the current knowledge and highlight gaps that need further research attention to strengthen evidence-based decision-making toward malaria elimination. Methods Publications were searched on the PubMed engine using search terms: (malaria vector control OR vector control OR malaria vector*) AND (Botswana OR Swaziland OR Eswatini OR Zambia OR Zimbabwe OR Mozambique). Opinions, perspectives, reports, commentaries, retrospective analysis on secondary data protocols, policy briefs, and reviews were excluded. Results The search resulted in 718 publications with 145 eligible and included in this review for the six countries generated over six decades. The majority (139) were from three countries, namely Zambia (59) and Mozambique (48), and Zimbabwe (32) whilst scientific publications were relatively scanty from front-line malaria elimination countries, such as Namibia (2), Botswana (10) and Eswatini (4). Most of the research reported in the publications focused on vector bionomics generated mostly from Mozambique and Zambia, while information on insecticide resistance was mostly available from Mozambique. Extreme gaps were identified in reporting the impact of vector control interventions, both on vectors and disease outcomes. The literature is particularly scanty on important issues such as change of vector ecology over time and space, intervention costs, and uptake of control interventions as well as insecticide resistance. Conclusions The review reveals a dearth of information about malaria vectors and their control, most noticeable among the frontline elimination countries: Namibia, Eswatini and Botswana. It is of paramount importance that malaria vector research capacity and routine entomological monitoring and evaluation are strengthened to enhance decision-making, considering changing vector bionomics and insecticide resistance, among other determinants of malaria vector control.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available