4.8 Article

Design of Hybrid MnO2-Polymer-Lipid Nanoparticles with Tunable Oxygen Generation Rates and Tumor Accumulation for Cancer Treatment

Journal

ADVANCED FUNCTIONAL MATERIALS
Volume 25, Issue 12, Pages 1858-1872

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adfm.201404511

Keywords

HIF-1; hybrid nanoparticles; hypoxia; manganese dioxide; nanoparticle toxicity

Funding

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) of Canada [RGPIN 170460-08]
  2. Canadian Cancer Society Innovation Grant [702133]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Manganese dioxide (MnO2) nanoparticles (NPs) were discovered in previous work to be effective in improving tumor oxygenation (hypoxia) and reducing H2O2 and acidity in the tumor microenvironment (TME) via local injection. To develop MnO2 formulations useful for clinical application, hybrid NPs are designed with tailored hydrophobicity and structure suitable for intravenous injection, with good blood circulation, biocompatibility, high tumor accumulation, and programmable oxygen generation rate. Two different hybrid NPs are constructed by embedding polyelectrolyte-MnO2 (PMD) in hydrophilic terpolymer/protein-MnO2 (TMD) or hydrophobic polymer/lipid-MnO2 (LMD) matrices. The in vitro reactivity of the MnO2 toward H2O2 is controlled by matrix material and NP structure and dependent on pH with up to two-fold higher O-2 generation rate at acidic (tumor) pH than at systemic pH. The hybrid NPs are found to be safe to cells in vitro and organs in vivo and effectively decrease tumor hypoxia and hypoxia-inducible-factor-1alpha through local or systemic administration. Fast acting TMD reduces tumor hypoxia by 70% in 0.5 h by local injection. Slow acting LMD exhibits superior tumor accumulation and retention through the systemic administration and decreased hypoxia by 45%. These findings encourage a broader use of hybrid MD NPs to overcome TME factors for cancer treatment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available