4.6 Article

Spatial Distribution of the Network Structure in Epoxy Resin via the MAXS-CT Method

Journal

LANGMUIR
Volume 38, Issue 37, Pages 11432-11439

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.2c01741

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. JST-Mirai Program, Japan [JPMJMI18A2]
  2. PRESTO, Japan [JPMJPR1672, JPMJPR1673]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We have successfully visualized the spatial heterogeneity of the reaction ratio in epoxy resins by combining medium-angle X-ray scattering (MAXS) and computed tomography (CT). The scattering peak in MAXS reflects the cross-linking structures and can be used to measure the reaction ratio. By reconstructing CT images from the peak intensity, we were able to visualize the spatial heterogeneity of the reaction ratio. This method can be applied to study the heterogeneity of cross-linked structures in other materials.
We have succeeded in visualizing the spatial heterogeneity of the reaction ratio in epoxy resins by combining medium-angle X-ray scattering (MAXS) and computed tomography (CT). The reaction ratio is proportional to the degree of cross-linking between epoxy and amine in epoxy resins. The reaction ratio and its spatial inhomogeneity affect the toughness of epoxy resins. However, there has been no non-destructive method to measure the spatial inhomogeneity of the reaction ratio, although we can measure only the spatially averaged reaction ratio by Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR). We found that the scattering peak reflected the cross-linking structures in the q region of MAXS and that the peak intensity is proportional to the reaction ratio. By reconstructing CT images from this peak intensity, we visualized the spatial heterogeneity of the reaction ratio. The application of this method may not be limited to epoxy resins but may extend to studying the heterogeneity of cross-linked structures in other materials.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available