4.1 Article

Investigation of microstructure evolution of Inconel 939 joint diffusion brazed using an amorphous liquated Ni-Cr-Fe-Si-B interlayer

Journal

KOVOVE MATERIALY-METALLIC MATERIALS
Volume 60, Issue 4, Pages 223-231

Publisher

REDAKCIA KOVOVE MATERIALY
DOI: 10.31577/km.2022.4.223

Keywords

diffusion brazing; Inconel 939; isothermal solidification; amorphous Ni-Cr-Fe--Si-Binterlayer

Ask authors/readers for more resources

IN-939 high-chromium nickel-based superalloy was diffusion brazed using an amorphous Ni-Cr-Fe-Si-B foil as an interlayer under high vacuum conditions. The microstructural evolution revealed three distinct zones of phases, with varying hardness values attributed to the presence of boride particles in the DAZ and absence of a second phase in the ISZ microstructure.
In this study, IN-939 high-chromium nickel-based superalloy was diffusion brazed using an amorphous Ni-Cr-Fe-Si-B foil as an interlayer and under high vacuum conditions. A successful joint was obtained at the applied temperature and bonding time of 1120 degrees C and 45 min. The microstructural evolution of the joint area was also investigated. The phases formed through the bonding process were categorized into three distinguished zones: isothermally solidified, athermally solidified, and diffusion-affected zones. According to the results, a gamma solid--solutionsingle-phase was produced in the centerline of the joint. Also, some precipitates with blockage and Widmanstatten morphologies were observed in the diffusion-affected area that appears to be Cr-rich borides. Chromium depletion occurred in the gamma matrix adjacent to these precipitates. In addition, the number of precipitates decreased, moving away from the interface of the isothermally solidified zone towards the base metal. The highest and lowest microhardness values were obtained for the DAZ and ISZ, respectively. The precipitation of hard Cr-rich boride particles in the DAZ and the absence of a second phase in the ISZ microstructure were probably responsible for this difference in the hardness.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available