4.7 Article

Development and comparison of field assisted sintering techniques to densify CeO2 ceramics

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE EUROPEAN CERAMIC SOCIETY
Volume 42, Issue 14, Pages 6599-6607

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2022.06.079

Keywords

Sintering; Spark plasma sintering; Field assisted sintering; Flash sintering; Oxide

Funding

  1. Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy's (BEIS) 505m Energy Innovation Programme
  2. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) [EP/S022295/1]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, cerium dioxide was densified using conventional and field-assisted sintering techniques. The effects of various sintering parameters on the microstructure of the ceramics, including temperature, hold time, atmosphere, electric field strength, and polarity, were examined.
Cerium dioxide (CeO2) was densified by conventional and field assisted sintering techniques in order to examine the effect of a range of sintering parameters on the resultant pellet microstructure, namely: temperature, hold time, atmosphere, electric field strength and polarity. CS at 1400 degrees C for 2 h in static air atmospheres provided the highest densities and grain sizes compared with an argon atmosphere, due to the retention of near stoichiometry maintaining sintering kinetics. SPS produced dense ceramics at similar sintering temperatures (1300 degrees C), but with greatly reduced sintering hold (5 min) and cycle times. However, microstructural inhomogeneity arose from the direct current polarity which led to oxygen ion diffusion toward the positive electrode. FS was performed with an alternating current electric field and produces samples of comparable density at sintering temperatures of similar to 1100 degrees C for a hold time of around 1 h with no inhomogeneity due to the alternating current employed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available