4.7 Article

Super-insulating, ultralight and high-strength mullite-based nanofiber composite aerogels

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE EUROPEAN CERAMIC SOCIETY
Volume 42, Issue 13, Pages 5995-6004

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2022.06.061

Keywords

Ceramic nanofiber aerogel; Mullite fiber; Mechanical robustness; Thermal insulation

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [52173261]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study successfully developed a novel closed-cell/nanowire structured ceramic nanofiber aerogel by combining electro-spinning technology and solvothermal synthesis method. By using hollow TiO2 spheres as pore-making material and infrared opacifier, and incorporating in-situ grown TiO2 nanowires on the fiber surface, the aerogel exhibits high mechanical robustness, low density, and ultralow thermal conductivity.
Ceramic nanofiber aerogel is one of the most attractive insulation materials in recent years. However, its practical application ability is limited at high temperature due to high radiation heat transfer. Herein, we constructed a novel closed-cell/nanowire structured mullite-based nanofiber composite aerogel via electro-spinning technology and solvothermal synthesis method. Hollow TiO2 spheres were used as pore-making material and infrared opacifier to reduce fiber solid heat conduction and high temperature radiation heat transfer simultaneously. In addition, TiO2 nanowires grown in-situ on the fiber surface further decrease the radiation heat transfer of aerogel and improve the mechanical properties. The unique structure endows the aerogel with high mechanical robustness (0.32-0.35 MPa, 10% strain), low density (39.2-47.5 mg/cm(3)) and ultralow thermal conductivity (-0.017 W m(-1 )K(-1) at 25 degrees C and-0.056 W m(-1) K-1 at 1000 degrees C). This work offers a novel strategy for the development of ceramic nanofiber aerogel at high temperature.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available