4.7 Article

Microstructure, cytocompatibility, and chemical durability of chemically strengthened LAS (Li2O-Al2O3-SiO2) glass-ceramic materials

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE EUROPEAN CERAMIC SOCIETY
Volume 42, Issue 13, Pages 6110-6118

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2022.06.063

Keywords

Ion exchange; Lithium disilicate glass-ceramic; Microstructures; Cytocompatibility; Chemical durability

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81901032, 82071169]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, the K+-Na+ ion exchange was used to strengthen LAS glass-ceramic materials prepared by hot-pressing sintering. The XRD results and dissolution experiment confirmed the ion exchange mechanism and the improved chemical durability. The cellular experiments showed that the chemically strengthened LAS glass-ceramic had good biocompatibility, indicating its potential as dental restorative materials.
The K+-Na+ ion exchange was used to strengthen LAS glass-ceramic materials prepared by hot-pressing sintering. The microstructure, cytocompatibility, and chemical durability of the chemically strengthened LAS glass-ceramics were characterized. The XRD results showed that the K+-Na+ ion exchange mainly occurred between the glass phase of the LAS glass-ceramics and molten salt baths. The ion-exchange process was mainly responsible for the improved chemical durability of the LAS glass-ceramics. The dissolution in acetic acid was significantly reduced from 72 to 15 mu g.cm(-2) after the ion-exchange treatment, which was attributed to residual compressive stress and increased contents of Q(3) and Q(4) structural units in the surface region of the LAS glass-ceramics. In addition, the chemically strengthened LAS glass-ceramic samples exhibited good biocompatibility determined by the CCK-8 process using the L929 cell line, having a promising potential as dental restorative materials.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available