4.4 Article

The comparison of different BCG strains in the intravesical treatment of non-muscle invasive urothelial carcinoma of urinary bladder-A real-world practice

Related references

Note: Only part of the references are listed.
Review Urology & Nephrology

European Association of Urology Guidelines on Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer (Ta, T1, and Carcinoma in Situ)

Marko Babjuk et al.

Summary: The updated EAU guidelines provide new information on the diagnosis and treatment of NMIBC for clinical practice. Individual risk assessment is crucial in determining the appropriate treatment for patients with different risk levels. Surgical intervention, including radical cystectomy, may be necessary for cases unresponsive to BCG treatment or with high risk of progression.

EUROPEAN UROLOGY (2022)

Article Oncology

Efficacy of three BCG strains (Connaught, TICE and RIVM) with or without secondary resection (re-TUR) for intermediate/high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancers: results from a retrospective single-institution cohort analysis

Francesco Del Giudice et al.

Summary: The study evaluated the clinical efficacy of three different BCG strains in intermediate-/high-risk NMIBC patients, showing that repeated resection surgery can improve recurrence and progression outcomes, and that TICE provides longer RFS in maintenance therapy. However, the relative efficacy of a single BCG strain is not influenced by re-TUR.

JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND CLINICAL ONCOLOGY (2021)

Article Urology & Nephrology

Diagnosis and Treatment of Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer: AUA/SUO Guideline

Sam S. Chang et al.

JOURNAL OF UROLOGY (2016)

Article Pathology

Prognostic Significance in Substaging of T1 Urinary Bladder Urothelial Carcinoma on Transurethral Resection

Wei-Chin Chang et al.

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY (2012)