4.5 Article

Retrospective Evaluation of Short-Term Outcomes of an Enhanced Recovery Protocol for Patients Undergoing Complex Abdominal Wall Reconstruction

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS
Volume 235, Issue 5, Pages 764-771

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/XCS.0000000000000340

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This retrospective study found that the use of enhanced recovery protocols (ERPs) may be beneficial for patients undergoing complex abdominal wall reconstruction (AWR), as it can reduce the occurrence of complications, shorten postoperative length of stay, and decrease the use of morphine equivalents. However, there was no significant difference in the readmission rate between ERP patients and non-ERP patients.
BACKGROUND: Enhanced recovery protocols (ERPs) have the potential to streamline care and improve short-term outcomes for surgical patients. However, for patients undergoing modern iterations of complex abdominal wall reconstruction (AWR), little literature exists on the effectiveness of these protocols. STUDY DESIGN: In this retrospective study we reviewed our institutional experience with complex AWR throughout a 2-year period with 1 year immediately before and 1 year after implementation of our ERP. Patients undergoing primarily minimally invasive complex AWR who were compliant with 11 elements of our ERP were compared with patients who received surgery before implementation of the protocol or did not meet these criteria. Baseline patient characteristics and patient outcomes including hospital length of stay, narcotic usage and readmission were compared across groups. Multivariable regression models were used to estimate the associations of our ERP protocol with outcomes adjusting for surgical approach. RESULTS: Median length of stay for the overall cohort (n = 132) was 3 days (interquartile range 1 to 4). Morbidity and mortality rates were 22.6% and 0.7%, respectively. ERP patients were less likely to have a complication (ERP compliant 8.7% [n = 46] vs non-ERP 30.2% [n = 86], p < 0.01), had a shorter median postoperative length of stay (median 1 vs 3 days, p < 0.01), and received fewer morphine equivalents (median 30.8 vs 45mg, p < 0.01). Readmission rate for ERP patients did not differ significantly vs non-ERP patients (6.5% vs 11.8%, p = 0.34). CONCLUSIONS: Use of ERPs in patients undergoing complex AWR may provide benefits for both patients and hospitals. (C) 2022 by the American College of Surgeons. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available