4.6 Article

Sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with T1a cutaneous malignant melanoma: A multicenter cohort study

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY
Volume 88, Issue 1, Pages 52-59

Publisher

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2022.09.040

Keywords

melanoma; prognosis; sentinel lymph node biopsy; surgery; survival; wide local excision

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Sentinel lymph node biopsy is not routinely recommended for T1a cutaneous melanoma due to low risk of positivity. This study identified age, primary tumor location, lymphovascular invasion, and mitotic rate as factors associated with positive sentinel lymph node in T1a melanoma patients.
Background: Sentinel lymph node biopsy is not routinely recommended for T1a cutaneous melanoma due to the overall low risk of positivity. Prognostic factors for positive sentinel lymph node (SLN1) in this population are poorly characterized. Objective: To determine factors associated with SLN1 in patients with T1a melanoma. Methods: Patients with pathologic T1a (\ 0.80 mm, nonulcerated) cutaneous melanoma from 5 highvolume melanoma centers from 2001 to 2020 who underwent wide local excision with sentinel lymph node biopsy were included in the study. Patient and tumor characteristics associated with SLN1 were analyzed by univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses. Age was dichotomized into #42 (25% quartile cutoff) and[42 years. Results: Of the 965 patients identified, the overall SLN1 was 4.4% (N = 43). Factors associated with SLN1 were age #42 years (7.5% vs 3.7%; odds ratio [OR], 2.14; P =.03), head/neck primary tumor location (9.2% vs 4%; OR, 2.75; P =.04), lymphovascular invasion (21.4% vs 4.2%; OR, 5.64; P =.01), and $2 mitoses/mm2 (8.2% vs 3.4%; OR, 2.31; P =.03). Patients \ 42 years with $2 mitoses/mm2 (N = 38) had a SLN1 rate of 18.4 % Limitations: Retrospective study. Conclusion: SLN1 is low in patients with T1a melanomas, but younger age, lymphovascular invasion, mitogenicity, and head/neck primary site appear to confer a higher risk of SLN1. ( J Am Acad Dermatol 2023;88:52-9.)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available