4.5 Article

Technical aspects of flap fixation after mastectomy for breast cancer: Guidelines for improving seroma-related outcome

Journal

JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY
Volume 127, Issue 1, Pages 28-33

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jso.27109

Keywords

breast cancer; flap fixation; mastectomy; seroma; sutures

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that using a minimum of 15 sutures spaced approximately 3.7 cm apart during mastectomy can significantly reduce the incidence of seroma formation. Surgical technique and flap fixation both play a crucial role in preventing seromas after mastectomy.
Objectives Previous studies have identified the added value of flap fixation in reducing seroma formation and its sequelae after mastectomy. The seroma reduction after mastectomy (SAM)-trial proved that sutures were superior to tissue glue. In this article, we will elaborate on the results of the SAM-trial to provide a clear surgical guideline. Methods All patients in the suture flap fixation cohort from the SAM-trial were analyzed if details regarding flap fixation were available. The most optimal number of sutures was determined using a receiving operator characteristics curve. The incidence of seroma formation between patients receiving the most optimal number of sutures and patients receiving fewer sutures was compared. Results The most optimal number of sutures proved to be 15. Patients with >= 15 sutures had a lower incidence of seroma formation at every time frame during follow-up. There was a significant difference at 6 weeks (odds ratio [OR]: 3.05, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.09-8.56), 3 months (OR: 4.62, 95% CI: 1.34-12.92), and 1 year postoperatively (OR: 20.48, 95% CI: 2.18-192.22). Ten days and 6 months postoperatively did not differ significantly. Conclusions Flap fixation in general, but also the surgical technique influences the incidence of seroma formation after mastectomy. Results suggest a minimum of 15 sutures, spaced approximately 3.7 cm apart.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available