4.6 Article

A theoretical and experimental approach to the optical response and the electronic structure of Hg1+ and Hg2+ nitroprussides

Journal

JOURNAL OF SOLID STATE CHEMISTRY
Volume 314, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jssc.2022.123380

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. DGTIC-UNAM [DGAPA-PAPIITIA202521]
  2. UNAM
  3. [SECITI/185/2021]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigates the electronic structure of mercury nitroprusside and elucidates the nature of the electronic transitions that explain its optical response. Experimental and computational methods were employed to analyze the influence of mercury ion valence on the electronic structure.
Transition metal nitroprussides have an n-type semiconductor electronic behavior whose optical response remains scarcely documented. Experimentally, their electronic structure is dominated by Metal to Ligand Charge Transfer (MLCT) type transition that arises from the nitroprusside moiety, [Fe(CN)(5)NO](2-). In addition to that optical transition, these materials can absorb light from d-d and band-band transitions. In this contribution, the electronic structure of monovalent, Hg-2[Fe(CN)(5)NO].2H(2)O, and divalent mercury, Hg[Fe(CN)5NO] is studied using ab-initio calculations and experimental results. Results from UV-Vis, IR, and Raman spectroscopies revealed the nature of the electronic transitions that explain the optical response of mercury nitroprusside systems. For the studied systems, the wide optical bandgap is revisited, and new values are reported. The influence of the valence of the mercury ion on the electronic structure and its changes according to the structural features are analyzed. The employed Meta-GGA functional SCAN and SCAN + rVV10 proved to be accurate methods to describe the structure and electronic properties of the studied mercury nitroprusside-based materials at a reasonable computational cost.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available