4.6 Article

Bionic inspired honeycomb structures and multi-objective optimization for variable graded layers

Journal

JOURNAL OF SANDWICH STRUCTURES & MATERIALS
Volume 25, Issue 2, Pages 215-231

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/10996362221127969

Keywords

Intersection unit of beetle elytra; honeycomb structures; bionic design; gradient design; multi-objective optimization

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Bionic and gradient designs show promising applications in honeycomb structures, with finite element modeling approach being verified through formulas and experiments. Bionic honeycombs exhibit distinct force and displacement curves under medium- and low-speed impacts, and some even show negative Poisson's ratio. Multi-objective optimization design successfully increases the specific energy absorption and decreases the peak crushing force of the optimized graded INT_6.
Bionic and gradient designs offer promising applications in honeycomb structures. The intersection unit of the beetle elytra is extracted as to enhance regular hexagonal honeycomb (RHH), and several bionic honeycombs are proposed. Finite element (FE) modeling approach is verified through formulae and experiments. Curves of force and displacement of bionic honeycombs present two prominent stages under medium- and low-speed impacts in plateau stage, and several bionic honeycombs exhibit a zero or negative Poisson's ratio. The specific energy absorption (SEA) of INT_6, whose crashworthiness is best in bionic honeycombs. A gradient design of INT_6 is implemented to further increase its crashworthiness. Multi-objective optimization design (MOD), which aims to simultaneously increase the SEA and reduce the peak crushing force, is adopted to determine the optimal parameters of each layer of graded INT_6. The SEA of the optimized graded INT_6 increase 142%, and its peak crushing force decrease by 25.4% compared with those of the INT_6.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available