4.6 Article

What about mental health after one year of COVID-19 pandemic? A comparison with the initial peak

Journal

JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRIC RESEARCH
Volume 153, Issue -, Pages 104-108

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2022.07.010

Keywords

COVID-19; Healthcare workers; Mental disorders; Elderly; Gender differences

Categories

Funding

  1. Instituto de Salud Carlos III
  2. Fondo de Investigacion Sanitaria (FIS)
  3. Centro de Investigacion Biomedica en Red de Salud Mental (CIBERSAM)
  4. Madrid Regional Government [S2010/ BMD-2422 AGES, S2017/BMD-3740]
  5. JanssenCilag
  6. Lundbeck
  7. Otsuka
  8. Pfizer
  9. Ferrer
  10. Juste
  11. Takeda
  12. Exeltis
  13. Angelini
  14. Casen-Recordati
  15. Otsuka-Lundbeck
  16. Lilly
  17. Astrazeneca
  18. CIBERSAM
  19. Instituto de Salud Carlos III

Ask authors/readers for more resources

During the COVID-19 pandemic, vulnerable populations including healthcare workers, individuals with mental disorders, and those aged 60 and above were identified. Healthcare workers had lower levels of anxiety, acute stress, and depression compared to non-healthcare workers, while individuals with mental disorders experienced higher levels of these symptoms. Older individuals had lower anxiety and acute stress, as well as a weaker depressive syndrome. Females had higher levels of anxiety, acute stress, and depression compared to males. After a year of pandemic, women and people with mental disorders continue to be particularly vulnerable to emotional distress.
A psychiatric epidemic has accompanied the COVID-19 pandemic and specific vulnerable populations have been identified. We aimed to explore the presence of anxiety, acute stress and depression among these vulnerable groups after a year of pandemic and relate them to our previous results obtained with the same methodology during the initial peak of the pandemic in Spain. A total of 2182 participants conducted a national survey, starting on March 2021. Sociodemographic infor-mation and clinical symptoms were assessed. The sample was divided into four groups in order to develop four substudies with these results: 1) Healthcare workers presented lower anxiety, acute stress, and depression than non-Healthcare workers (p < 0.001), being nurses the most affected. 2) People with mental disorders experienced higher anxiety, acute stress, and depression than people without (p < 0.001), as well as a higher rate of COVID cases (14% vs. 9.3%, p = 0.041). 3) People >= 60 years old presented lower anxiety and acute stress than people < 60, (p < 0.05) and a weaker depressive syndrome (p = 0.003). 4) Males presented lower anxiety, acute stress and depression than females (p < 0.001). According to the results obtained during the initial peak, Healthcare workers have developed efficient coping strategies, while elders have managed to maintain their previously emotional balance. Notwithstanding, women and people with mental disorders continue to be vulnerable to emotional distress after a year of pandemic. Women and people with mental disorders continue to be especially vulnerable to emotional distress after a year of pandemic.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available