4.4 Article

Thermal scratch healing of poly(methyl methacrylate-co-methacrylate) ionomers neutralized with various cations

Journal

JOURNAL OF POLYMER RESEARCH
Volume 29, Issue 10, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10965-022-03270-5

Keywords

Ionomer; Scratch; Storage modulus; Healing temperature; Neutralization degree; Cation type

Funding

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea [NRF-2014R1A1A2058489]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The effects of cation type and under-neutralization on the scratch healing of poly(methyl methacrylate-co-methacrylate) ionomers by heat treatment were investigated. The study found that within the tested time frame, regardless of the cation type of the neutralizing agents or the degree of under-neutralization, the ionomers exhibited a healing efficiency of 84-98%.
The effects of the cation type and under-neutralization on the scratch healing of poly(methyl methacrylate-co-methacrylate) ionomers by heat treatment were investigated as a function of time. The scratch healing efficiency of the ionomer was found to reach 84-98% within 10 min at a temperature at which logE' (Pa) = ca. 6.6, regardless of the type of cations of the neutralizing agents or the under-neutralization or the multiplet plasticization. From the results of this study and previous study, it was concluded that a significant level of scratch healing effect without sample deformation could be obtained in a fairly short time at a temperature at which the logE' (Pa) of the ionomers was maintained at ca. 6.5 +/- 0.1, regardless of the polarity of the ionomers, type of neutralizing agents, and degree of under-neutralization of the ionomers. Furthermore, we propose that the above results can be extended to optimal thermal scratch healing conditions for some of amorphous polymers, and are also useful when only small damaged areas of polymer materials are needed to be healed thermally.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available