4.8 Article

An Atomic Insight into the Confusion on the Activity of Fe3O4 Nanoparticles as Peroxidase Mimetics and Their Comparison with Horseradish Peroxidase

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY LETTERS
Volume 13, Issue 38, Pages 8872-8878

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.2c02331

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21902138]
  2. Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation [2021A1515010064]
  3. Hong Kong Research Grants Council [CityU 21301719, 11300020, 11305721]
  4. Chow Sang Sang Group Research Fund - Chow Sang Sang Holdings International Limited [9229063]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study resolves the debate on the activity of Fe3O4 nanoparticles as peroxidase mimetics and provides an atomic view into their origin. The redox between H2O2 and Fe(II) sites on the Fe3O4 surface was identified as the key step in producing OH radicals.
Although Fe3O4 nanoparticles were early reported to outperform horseradish peroxidase (HRP), recent studies suggested that this material bears a very poor activity instead. Here, we resolve this disagreement by reviewing the definition of descriptors used and provide an atomic view into the origin of Fe3O4 nanoparticles as peroxidase mimetics. The redox between H2O2 and Fe(II) sites on the Fe3O4 surface was identified as the key step to producing OH radicals for the oxidation of colorimetric substrates. This mechanism involving free radicals is distinct from that of HRP oxidizing substrates with a radical retained on its Fe-porphyrin ring. Surprisingly, the distribution and chemical state of Fe species were found to be very different on single- and polycrystalline Fe3O4 nanoparticles with the latter bearing not only a higher Fe(II)/Fe(III) ratio but also a more reactive Fe(II) species at surface grain boundaries. This accounts for the unexpected gap in the catalytic constant (k(cat)) observed for this material in the literature.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available