4.8 Article

Origin of Photovoltaics in Organic Solar Cells at Negligible Energy Level Offsets-An Insight of the Charge Accumulation Effect

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY LETTERS
Volume -, Issue -, Pages 10404-10408

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.2c02742

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China
  2. Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Catalysis
  3. [21733005]
  4. [91833304]
  5. [2020B121201002]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigates the nonequilibrium energy level displacement from the perspective of built-in potential caused by charge accumulation to explain the origin of charge separation driving force at negligible energy level offsets. Due to different carrier mobilities, carriers with high mobility are rapidly transmitted to the electrode, while carriers with low mobility remain in the material, resulting in charge accumulation. It is found that higher carrier mobility improves the efficiency of photovoltaic devices, but a balance of charge transport is needed.
Reducing the energy level offset is one of the key elements of low open-circuit voltage loss in organic solar cells. However, the origin of charge separation driving force at negligible energy level offsets still remains unexplained. Herein, from the perspective of built-in potential caused by charge accumulation, we discuss the nonequilibrium energy level displacement as current passing with distinct variable current densities. Due to the different carrier mobilities of electrons and holes in organic semiconductor materials, carriers with high mobility will be rapidly transmitted to the electrode, while those with low mobility will remain in the materials, resulting in the accumulation of corresponding charges. It is suggested that the higher the carrier mobility, the better the efficiency of photovoltaic devices, with the balance of the charge transport.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available