4.8 Article

Superatomic Three-Center Bond in a Tri-Icosahedral Au36Ag2(SR)18 Cluster: Analogue of 3c-2e Bond in Molecules

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY LETTERS
Volume 13, Issue 43, Pages 10147-10152

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.2c02552

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Anhui Province
  3. Natural Science Research Project for Colleges and Universities of Anhui Province
  4. [22103001]
  5. [2108085QB64]
  6. [KJ2019A0009]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Probing the nature of electronic stability for ligand-protected gold clusters is important in gold chemistry. A recent synthesis of a thermally stable Au36Ag2(SR)(18) nanocluster revealed its electronic stability through a superatomic three-center bond, expanding the understanding of superatomic bonding.
Probing the nature of electronic stability for ligand-protected gold clusters is important in gold chemistry. A thermally stable Au36Ag2(SR)(18) nanocluster was synthesized recently. It has a D-3h tri-icosahedral [Au30Ag2](12+) core with 20 valence electrons, which does not follow the magic number of gold superatoms. Herein, we propose a superatomic three-center bond to unveil its electronic stability. The [Au30Ag2](12+) core is viewed as a union of three face-fused superatoms, and chemical bonding analysis suggests a three-superatom-center two-electron (3sc-2e) bond for the octet rule of each superatom, which mimics the bonding framework of the D-3h O-3(2-) molecule. Moreover, a liganded tri-icosahedral [Au27Pt3Ag2](11+) core with 18 valence electrons is predicted, and three 2sc-2e bonds are formed between each of two superatoms to satisfy the octet rule (analogue of D-3h O-3), indicating the flexibility of superatomic bonding. Such a superatomic three-center bond extends the community of superatomic bonding and gives a new perspective for superatom assembling.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available