4.6 Article

O2 Oxidation and Sublimation Kinetics of Single Silicon Nanoparticles at 1200-2050 K: Variation of Reaction Rates, Evolution of Structural and Optical Properties, and the Active-to- Passive Transition

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY C
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.2c05985

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Office of Naval Research [N00014-15-1-2681]
  2. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Basic Energy Sciences, Gas Phase Chemical Physics Program [DE-SC-0018049]
  3. Henry Eyring Endowed Chair

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The sublimation and O2 etching kinetics of individual silicon nanoparticles were studied using a mass spectrometry technique. The results showed that the etching efficiency varied with time and temperature, and the optical properties of the nanoparticles changed during the etching process.
Sublimation and O2 etching kinetics for a series of individual silicon (Si) nanoparticles (NPs) were studied for NP temperatures (TNP) from 1200 to 2050 K using a single NP mass spectrometry technique. Sublimation was significant for TNP > 1700 K, with rates reasonably well fit to Arrhenius kinetics but evolving, particularly during initial heating. O2 etching efficiencies varied from NP-to-NP and with changing TNP, but they also evolved dramatically over time. For TNP <= 1500 K, NPs were observed to passivate after losing 30-50% of the initial NP mass. At higher TNP, etching efficiency decreased over time but never passivated. Interestingly, bulk Si passivation has not been observed for the range of TNP and O2 pressures used here, and a model was developed to test the effects of several NP-specific mechanistic parameters on both the initial and time-dependent etching behavior. The optical properties of the hot NPs were also found to evolve as the NPs etched, particularly during the initial fast mass loss, and correlations between emission intensities and etching kinetics were examined.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available