4.7 Article

Switchable Cycloadditions of Mesoionic Dipoles: Refreshing up a Regioselective Approach to Two Distinctive Heterocycles

Journal

JOURNAL OF ORGANIC CHEMISTRY
Volume 87, Issue 19, Pages 12854-12866

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.joc.2c01444

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Junta de Extremadura and Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional (European Regional Development Fund) [GR21039]
  2. Ministerio de Universidades, Spain
  3. European Union-Next Generation EU

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study revisits the reactivity of thiazol-3-ium-4-olates with alkynes, and demonstrates that the structural variation of mesoionic rings can influence the steric outcome, leading to the regioselective formation of either five- or six-membered heterocycles. Microwave activation is found to enhance reaction rates, and density functional theory calculations provide insights into the mechanism of the reaction.
Mesoionic rings are among the most versatile 1,3-dipoles, as witnessed recently by their incorporation into bio-orthogonal strategies, and capable of affording unconventional heterocycles beyond the expected scope of Huisgen cycloadditions. Herein, we revisit in detail the reactivity of thiazol-3-ium-4-olates with alkynes, leading to thiophene and/or pyrid-2-one derivatives. A structural variation at the parent mesoionic dipole alters sufficiently the steric outcome, thereby favoring the regioselective formation of a single transient cycloadduct, which undergoes chemoselective fragmentation to either five- or six-membered heterocycles. The synthetic protocol benefits largely from microwave (MW) activation, which enhances reaction rates. The mechanism has been interrogated with the aid of density functional theory (DFT) calculations, which sheds light into the origin of the regioselectivity and points to a predictive formulation of reactivity involving competing pathways of mesoionic cycloadditions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available