4.5 Article

Job satisfaction among small rural hospital nurses: A cross-sectional study

Journal

JOURNAL OF NURSING SCHOLARSHIP
Volume 55, Issue 1, Pages 378-387

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jnu.12800

Keywords

burnout; hospital; job satisfaction; nursing; practice environment; rural

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aims to explore the relationships between job satisfaction, community satisfaction, practice environment, burnout, and intention to leave of nurses working in small rural hospitals in Australia. The findings show that overall job satisfaction is high, and emotional exhaustion, nurse manager ability, leadership, and support of nurses are the most significant predictors of job satisfaction.
Purpose: To explore the relationships between job satisfaction, community satisfaction, practice environment, burnout, and intention to leave of nurses working in Australian small rural hospitals. Design: A national cross-sectional survey of 383 nurses from Australian rural public hospitals of less than 99 beds during 2018. Methods: Job satisfaction was measured on a four-point Likert scale. Factors associated with community satisfaction, practice environment, burnout and intention to leave were analyzed using multiple linear regression to explore the predictors of job satisfaction. Findings: Overall job satisfaction was positive, with most nurses moderately (n = 146, 38.1%) or very satisfied (n = 107, 27.9%) with their current job. Emotional exhaustion, nurse manager ability, leadership and support of nurses were the most significant predictors of job satisfaction. Conclusion: This study provides new insight into the factors impacting the job satisfaction of nurses working in rural hospitals. The knowledge gained is important to inform strategies to retain nurses in rural areas and, in turn, ensure rural communities have access to quality health care.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available