4.7 Article

A feasible incentive contract between a manufacturer and his fairness-sensitive retailer engaged in strategic marketing efforts

Journal

JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT MANUFACTURING
Volume 30, Issue 1, Pages 193-206

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10845-016-1239-5

Keywords

Feasible incentive contract; Fairness-sensitive; Profit-sharing; Marketing effort

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71371086, 71501128]
  2. Central University Basic Research Funds of China [JUSRP51416B]
  3. Shandong Social Science Planning Fund Program [14CGLJ07]
  4. Cross-synthesis of Science & Humanities of Shanghai Jiao Tong University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper considers a feasible incentive contract between a manufacturer and a fairness-sensitive retailer. The manufacturer (he) dominates the supply chain and determines his wholesale price, while the retailer (she) focuses on marketing and retailing. Thus, the retailer's decision concerns her marketing efforts and retail price. The market demand is linked directly to the retailer's marketing efforts and retail price. Therefore, we find that the retailer's fairness preference leads her to engage in high-level marketing efforts, but causes the manufacturer to set a low wholesale price. A strategic decision-making approach that the manufacturer can employ is to consider the retailer's fairness sensitivity. We also find that the retailer's concern for fairness influences the manufacturer's decisions strongly and affects his expected profit negatively. The manufacturer dominates the supply chain, thereby motivating him to design a feasible incentive contract to maximize his expected profit. Thus, a fairness-embedded profit-sharing contract applied with a Nash bargaining process is proposed to maximize the manufacturer's expected profit. Both mathematical derivations and numerical studies show that the incentive contract leads to Pareto improvement in the utilities of the manufacturer and the retailer.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available