4.6 Review

Hollow nanocages for electrochemical glucose sensing: A comprehensive review

Journal

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR STRUCTURE
Volume 1268, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.molstruc.2022.133646

Keywords

Hollow nanocages; Glucose biosensing; Electrochemical nanoporous materials

Funding

  1. Higher Education Commission (HEC) of Pakistan [21-1119/SRGP/RD/HEC]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This review article presents the potential of hollow nanocages for glucose biosensing applications, compares the electrocatalytic efficiency of different hollow nanocages, and recommends the most suitable metal/metal oxide for glucose sensing.
The hollow nanocages (HNCs) have been emerged as potential candidates for glucose biosensing appli-cations because of presence of inner and outer surfaces and porous walls, offering a large surface area and electrocatalytic activity. Quite a few studies have been conducted to explore glucose oxidation po-tential of HNCs. However, a comprehensive review regarding glucose biosensing applications of HNCs is missing in the pool of literature. The available reviews have focused on the synthesis and nanostructures of hollow nanocages but comparison of their electrocatalytic efficiency was not considered. To address this discrepancy, the present review has been dedicated to glucose sensing applications of HNCs. This re-view summarizes the published literature to date on electrochemical glucose sensing methods by hollow nanocages and provides a comprehensive and critical comparison of features such as the stability, re-sponse times and the sensitivity of hollow nanocages for the determination of glucose. Furthermore, the authors have recommended the most suitable and efficient metal/metal oxide for glucose sensing based on the theoretical calculations using Density Functional Theory (DFT).(c) 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available