4.7 Article

Measurement and correlation of isobaric molar heat capacities of deep eutectic solvents consisting of choline chloride and triethylene glycol

Journal

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR LIQUIDS
Volume 366, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.molliq.2022.120229

Keywords

Isobaric molar heat capacity; Deep eutectic solvent; Choline chloride; Triethylene glycol; Correlation

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51936009, 51976167]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [xzy022021021]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, the isobaric molar heat capacities of deep eutectic solvents consisting of choline chloride and triethylene glycol were investigated, and the correlation between them was established based on experimental data.
Deep eutectic solvents are environmentally friendly substitutes to room temperature ionic liquids in broad engineering applications like biofuel purification, polymer synthesis, gas capture, and organic extraction. In this work, the isobaric molar heat capacities of deep eutectic solvents consisting of choline chloride and triethylene glycol (in molar ratio of 1: 3, 1: 4, and 1: 5) are investigated by flow method in the temperature from 334.91 K to 364.98 K and pressure from 0.19 MPa to 25.21 MPa. The relative expended uncertainty of measurement system is calculated to be 1.4 % within 95 % degree of confidence. Experimental results show that the isobaric molar heat capacity increases linearly with higher tempera-ture and lower pressure. With choline chloride added in triethylene glycol, the heat capacity decreases linearly with the decreasing of triethylene glycol molar fraction. Finally, the correlation of these binary mixtures is established based on the experimental data with the maximum absolute relative deviation and average absolute relative deviation of 1.01 % and 0.31 %, respectively.(c) 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available